What Is the Difference between Open Source ALM System Vs Low Cost?

Open source ALM systems are of course developed after preparing requirement lists that might even run to hundreds of pages in length, in a way to satisfy several stake holders. However, if the long list does not have one level of detail that is crucial for the core functionality of your business, you might want to interfere with the code to make it compatible for your unique business needs. You should know which test case management tool to use. This can in turn be time and cost prohibitive, when you do it on your own.

Appropriate software testing tools should be used to make the application work in your favor and it takes appropriate human resources to do it correctly for you, if you are not a professional who can do it.
Low-detail, high impact requirement gaps in goal modeling will surely be there in open source ALM systems. A bit of touch up coding will always be needed.

JRD Sessions Keepers of Your Vision

Customized project charting and business process documentation is very important to produce application lifecycle management systems that serve as real keepers of your vision. Requirement analysis done in JRD sessions would be of great help to elicit requirements that have cross functional implications between stakeholders who will benefit from the ALM system.

Cross-Functional Implications

The details of the different requirements of stake holders would be analyzed and the cross-functional implications considered and eventually the exact performance requirement and functional specification would be established and the ALM system would be developed accordingly in the low cost system.


Low cost ALM tools would be highly specific to suit the core functionality and ancillary functionality requirements of the business in question. It is possible to have every level of detail required in the features section to achieve the efficiency and usefulness of the application, to suit the intended goal.

Customized prototyping is very important to establish the exact requirements of the stake holders who will benefit from the ALM.  Customized prototyping would help keep away from too much of abstraction. Low cost ALM systems can be highly contextual and to the point. The dependency between higher level requirements and lower level requirements can be prioritized as needed without compromising on the usefulness of the application.

Never Miss the Important Stuff

Customization guarantees completeness. Countless additional details that are unique to the stakeholders of your business can be added. Every stakeholder might have their own concern with respect to the system. An architecture design that addresses the concerns by giving importance to the separate points of views and eventually producing an application that never misses the important stuff, even if it is a low level detail is produced.

Avoid Innumerable Variables

In cases where controversial change requests arise, you will always have the services of the developer handy at your service at reduced overall cost. And, your developer will have a clear idea about which bug tracking system or bug tracking tool should be used for your application. You might want to read that article How to Choose a Bug Tracking System.
You can avoid the mess up of having to deal with innumerable variables and features that you do not need at all and you can confine yourselves to dealing with just what you exactly need for your business.


While open source ALM systems target general result of a large pool of stake holders, low cost ALM systems that are customized are highly specific, robust, secure, reliable, maintainable, and scalable.

Open source ALM systems might leave you guilty with respect to requirement gaps. Low cost ALM systems fill in the requirement gaps for you as needed.